JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 1, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Adela Gomez De Zea Vs. La Direccion De Sanidad De Las Fuerza Aerea De Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Primero Civil Del Circuito De Villavicencio  Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Villavicencio, Sala De Decision Civil, Familia, Laboral. Se Resolvio Remitir Al Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Villavicencio, Sala Civil, Familia, Laboral, El Expdiente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela De La Referencia Para Que Asuma De Forma Inmediata El Conocimiento Del Asunto.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITASE al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Villavicencio, Sala Civil, Familia, Laboral, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Adela Gomez de Zea contra la Direccion de Sanidad de la Fuerza Aerea para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del asunto.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Villavicencio, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.